Safe Drinking Water Act Essay Practice
Water Pollution and Drinking Water Quality Essay
937 Words4 Pages
All around the world, countries are fighting to keep their drinking water clean. Whether it’s streams, rivers, or lakes, countries have taken great measures to maintain high quality drinking water for both human consumption and animal consumption. Countries must first understand the sources of the polltion, then determine the best methods to eliminate the pollution. Clean drinking water is a valuable resource and a the key to human survival. Plants and animals also depend on water for their growth, so all water must be kept clean. The major contributors to water pollution can be classified in three categories, industrial, agricultural and municipal.
Examples of industrial wastes that can contaminant bodies of water are oil spills, acid…show more content…
First, control over the discharge can take place at the point of generation within the plant itself. Second, the polluted water can be sent to water treatment plants before it is released into the surrounding water sources. Third, the waste water can be treated within the plant and recycled again, or treated in the plant and released.
Another form of industrial waste that contributes to water pollution is acid rain. Acid rain is a product of industries burning coal. The burning of coal produces sulfur oxide and nitrogen oxide, and when these chemicals combine with the earth’s atmosphere it forms acid rain The Northeastern part of the United States has the worst acid rain levels in the world. More specific, the states with the highest concentration are Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and some boarding parts of Canada and New England area. The falling acid rain can destroy plants and animals in several different ways. The acidification of a lake, river, or stream because of the high acidic levels in the water kills algae. Since algae are the main source of food, for many species of fish, they will also suffer from the high acid levels.
Acid rain also soaks into ground and dissolves nutrients from the soil. When the plants call upon these nutrients to grow, the absence kills the vegetation. Over a short period of time plants begin
Safe Drinking Water Act
The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, amended in 1986 and 1996, is the legal basis for regulating public drinking water in the United States. Its passage was spurred largely by mounting public awareness about contaminants in the environment, and concern for the safety of drinking water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has primary enforcement responsibility.
Evolution of the Law
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) of 1974 was the first federal law mandating drinking-water standards for all public water systems, from big cities to roadside campgrounds. It was enacted as a result of a federal survey of large and small public drinking-water systems that revealed poor water quality was endangering public health. The U.S. Public Health Service had set some drinking water quality standards in 1914, but these were merely voluntary for public systems.
Under the 1974 SDWA, public water systems were required to follow water quality standards for particular contaminants. Water systems must be tested for these contaminants and, if necessary, the water is treated to reduce contaminants to the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) set for each contaminant.
The first standards for required monitoring by public water systems were set for some inorganic contaminants (e.g., metals, nitrates), microbial contaminants (e.g., bacteria), turbidity , and radionuclides (trace amounts of radioactivity emitters such as radium, uranium, and radon). Also, special protection was made available to communities with an aquifer that was the sole source of drinking water.
The U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act helps ensure a safe drinking-water supply from public water systems, whether small or large.
Private wells are not regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. The EPA encourages, but cannot force, private well owners to have their water tested at least annually for health-threatening contaminants.
Major amendments to the SDWA in 1986 set a goal of eighty-three contaminant standards to be established by 1989 and twenty-five more contaminants for every 3 years thereafter. The additional contaminants identified in the 1986 Amendments included organic contaminants (e.g., pesticides and volatile organic compounds ) and chlorine disinfection byproducts. Lead pipes and lead solder in new drinking-water systems were banned. Rules were to be written regarding monitoring injection wells injecting wastes below drinking-water sources. States were required by the amendments to develop a wellhead protection program for public wells. And all surface water systems (i.e., systems using lakes or streams) had to use disinfection techniques and filter their water sources to remove microbes, including bacteria, viruses, and protozoans that commonly occur in surface water. These microbes do not routinely occur in groundwater (unless it has been contaminated); therefore, groundwater-based water systems were not required to disinfect or filter their water unless a need exists.
The 1996 amendments created a state revolving loan program to provide loan money to communities needing system upgrades or source-water protection. The 1986 Amendment requiring EPA to develop standards for twenty-five new contaminants every 3 years was rescinded. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was to consider risk and cost–benefits of implementing any particular standard. Community water systems were required to publish annual reports to inform citizens about contaminant levels in their water and their community water system's performance in meeting drinking-water standards.
A Source-Water Assessment Program was added. All states were to survey land uses around every source water area (surface or groundwater), delineate the source-area boundaries, identify potential contaminant sources within them, and estimate the susceptibility of the drinking-water source to those potential contaminant sources.
Of the nation's 170,000 public drinking-water systems, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that more than half (about 53 percent) use groundwater as their source; the remainder (47 percent) use surface water. Regardless of source, water for public supply must meet federal and state standards designed to protect public health. There are two types of drinking-water standards: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWR) and National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWR).
The NPDWR lists both a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) and a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for each listed contaminant. The MCLG reflects the contaminant level below which there is no known or expected human health risk. It is not an enforceable standard. The MCL is set as close as possible to the MCLG based on best available treatment technology and cost. It is the maximum amount of a contaminant that may be delivered to users of a public water system and is a legally enforceable standard.
The NSDWR sets nonmandatory, nonenforceable standards for fifteen contaminants that may cause water to have an undesirable color or odor, but do not have potentially adverse health consequences. Examples include iron, total dissolved solids, and pH.
As of 2003, ninety-five water contaminants were regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Approximately seven hundred substances have been cataloged as potential contaminants. Contaminants include harmless constituents as well as harmful ones.
Low levels of trace metals, nutrients, minerals, and salts are found naturally in water. At low concentrations, these contaminants are harmless; some may even be desirable—for example, many people prefer the taste of slightly mineralized water. Other contaminants are manufactured, and are undesirable at any concentration. Similarly, any level of bacteria in drinking water is considered to be a violation of the MCL.
The EPA's contaminant categories as of 2002 included: microorganisms ( Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, Legionella , total coliforms, fecal coliforms and E. coli ), disinfectant and disinfection byproducts, inorganic chemicals, organic chemicals, and radionuclides. MCLs for the ninety contaminants regulated as of 2002, their probable source, and related health effects can be found online at <http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html> .
Keeping Water Safe
To ensure compliance with safe drinking water standards, water systems are required to frequently sample and test the water being delivered. If contaminant levels exceed MCLs, the water system must discontinue the use of that source until the level is reduced to below the MCL by treatment, blending, or finding an alternative source. Customers must be advised immediately of actions necessary to prevent disease outbreaks, such as boiling water before drinking in the case of microorganisms, or by switching to bottled water.
Management trends and challenges to protect drinking water are numerous. Infrastructure maintenance and replacement is needed to fix leaks, prevent breaks, and ensure proper water treatment. New technology allows scientists to measure the presence of previously unstudied or undetected contaminants (e.g., pharmaceuticals and personal care products, or PPCPs), which then must be investigated to determine if they, too, pose a human health risk in drinking water.
Population growth increases demand and changing land-use practices threatens supply quality, particularly groundwater. An aging population means more elderly citizens, who are more at risk from drinking-water contaminants. The public needs to learn not only to conserve water, but also to realize what daily practices add to nonpoint-source pollution of groundwater and surface water so they can avoid or minimize those practices. Rural areas of the United States have a particular challenge, since small systems often cannot afford these costly mandates.
The Safe Drinking Water Act is important to water management in that it illuminates the interconnection of water resources and land resources, and how land use affects water quality. In addition, source-water quality affects drinking-water treatment costs, so monitoring and enforcement of the SDWA and the Clean Water Act go hand in hand.
Laurel E. Phoenix
and Edward F. Vitzthum
Kubasek, Nancy K., and Gary S. Silverman. Environmental Law, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 25 Years of the Safe Drinking Water Act: History and Trends. EPA-816-R-99-007, December. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. Available online at <http://www.epa.gov/safewater/sdwa/trends.html> .
Although the U.S. drinking-water industry and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been working on projects to enhance security of drinking-water supplies since the 1990s, the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington, D.C. catapulted water security to the forefront. In 2002, the U.S. Congress enacted the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act. With respect to water supplies, this legislation amended the Safe Drinking Water Act and specified actions that community water systems and the EPA must take to improve the security of the nation's drinking-water infrastructure.
In short, every community water system serving at least 3,300 persons must prepare or revise an emergency response plan, and conduct an assessment of their vulnerability to terrorist attack or other intentional act intended to substantially disrupt a safe and reliable drinking-water supply. Among other duties, EPA must conduct studies regarding the intentional introduction of harmful contaminants; the methods by which drinking-water infrastructures could be disrupted; and the methods by which alternative supplies of drinking water could be provided in the event of destruction or impairment of public water systems.
For further information about the Safe Drinking Water Act and water infrastructure security, see <http://www.epa.gov/safewater/security/index.html> . Selected links to industry and government websites are available through this EPA webpage.
Also read article about Safe Drinking Water Act from Wikipedia
Runoff, Factors Affecting Salmon Decline and Recovery